When selecting the best injection molding machine for your manufacturing needs, several brands stand out for their innovation, quality, and reliability. This article will compare six leading brands:
The companies are Haitian International, ENGEL, KraussMaffei, Husky Injection Molding Systems, Milacron, Arburg, a focusing on price, applications, post-sales support, machine quality, and annual revenue. Let’s look at the most updated countdown, ordered by revenue during 2022 and 2023, and give you the real big picture.
You can also read Next Gen Injection Molding: Best Practices
The revenue statistics provided are estimates based on the most recent available data, generally from fiscal years 2022 or 2023, depending on the company. These figures are sourced from company reports, industry publications, and financial summaries that reflect their latest reported annual revenues.
Arburg
- Headquarters: Lossburg, Germany
- Year Founded: 1923
- Annual Revenue: Approximately $0.9 US billion
- Price: Arburg machines are generally on the higher end of the price spectrum, reflecting their advanced technology and robust build.
- Customer Satisfaction: 4.5/5
- Clamping Force Range: 10 to 650 tons
- Technology Development: Arburg is celebrated for its precision and reliability, with a focus on high-quality all-electric and hybrid machines. The company invests heavily in Industry 4.0 technologies and smart production solutions.
- SWOT Analysis:
- Pros: Renowned for precision, reliability, and excellent service support. Machines are known for their durability and consistent performance.
- Cons: Premium pricing can be a barrier for some, and the technology can be more complex for new users.
Milacron
- Headquarters: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Year Founded: 1884
- Annual Revenue: Approximately $1.1 US billion
- Price: Milacron offers moderately priced machines, as well as focusing on value for money with comprehensive features.
- Customer Satisfaction: 4/5
- Clamping Force Range: 35 to 8,000 tons
- Technology Development: Milacron is known for its innovation in both hydraulic and all-electric machines, with a focus on high-speed production and energy efficiency. In addition, They also offer advanced control systems and comprehensive automation solutions.
- SWOT Analysis:
- Pros: Wide range of machines, strong presence in North America, good service network, and innovative technologies.
- Cons: Some users have reported issues with the complexity of machine operation and higher maintenance costs.
Husky Injection Molding Systems
- Headquarters: Bolton, Ontario, Canada
- Year Founded: 1953
- Annual Revenue: Approximately $1.4 US billion
- Price: Husky machines are among the highest in price, known for their premium offerings, particularly for high-speed, high-precision applications.
- Customer Satisfaction: 4.5/5
- Clamping Force Range: 12 to 1200 Tons
- Technology Development: Husky excels in high-performance machines, particularly for packaging and beverage applications. The company focuses on high-speed production, energy efficiency, and advanced control systems.
- SWOT Analysis
- Pros: Leading provider of high-performance machines, particularly in packaging and beverage industries. Excellent customer service and support.
- Cons: Higher cost, specialized focus may limit appeal for some sectors.
KraussMaffei
- Headquarters: Munich, Germany
- Year Founded: 1838
- Annual Revenue: Approximately $1.7 US billion
- Price: KraussMaffei machines are positioned in the mid to high range, reflecting their high quality, durability, and advanced technology.
- Customer Satisfaction: 4.5/5
- Clamping Force Range: 50 to 5,500 tons
- Technology Development: KraussMaffei is known for its innovative technology in injection molding, extrusion, and reaction process machinery. The company focuses on integrating Industry 4.0 solutions, advanced automation, and sustainable production practices to enhance efficiency and precision.
- Main Reasons:
- Pros: Exceptional build quality, wide range of clamping forces, advanced technological features, strong emphasis on automation and Industry 4.0 integration, and high customer satisfaction.
- Cons: Higher upfront costs, which might be a consideration for smaller enterprises or those with tight budgets.
ENGEL
- Headquarters: Schwertberg, Austria
- Year Founded: 1945
- Annual Revenue: Approximately $1.8 US billion
- Price: ENGEL machines are on the pricier side, reflecting their sophisticated features and high-quality standards.
- Customer Satisfaction: 4.5/5
- Clamping Force Range: 28 to 5,000 tons
- Technology Development: ENGEL is noted for its advanced technology, including all-electric and hybrid injection molding machines. The company emphasizes energy efficiency, innovative automation solutions, and integrated manufacturing processes.
- SWOT Analysis:
- Pros: High-quality machines, advanced technology, strong global support network, and excellent energy efficiency.
- Cons: Higher price point, which might be a concern for budget-conscious buyers.
By integrating advanced data-driven insights and real-time monitoring, the industry is evolving to meet modern manufacturing demands. This development is poised to reshape market standards, influencing quality and performance across the board. Image Courtesy of Engel.
Haitian International
- Headquarters: Ningbo, P. R. China
- Annual Revenue: Approximately $1.9 US billion
- Price: Haitian is known for its cost-effective machines, making them a popular choice for larger-scale, cost-sensitive production.
- Customer Satisfaction: 4/5
- Clamping Force Range: 60 to 8,800 tons
- Technology Development: Haitian International is famous for its cost-effective solutions and broad range of machines, including hydraulic, hybrid, and fully electric types. The company has invested heavily in automation and Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance machine efficiency and integration.
- SWOT Analysis:
- Pros: Competitive pricing, robust performance, and a wide range of machines suitable for various applications.
- Cons: Some customers report challenges with service support and parts availability, especially outside of China.
Conclusion
Selecting the right injection molding machine goes beyond just the price. In addition, when the application and precise calculations are taken into consideration, the most expensive machine may not necessarily be the most suitable for your needs. Therefore, It’s crucial to analyze both the clamping unit and injection unit specifications separately.
- Clamping Unit Specifications: Beyond just clamp tonnage, consider tie-bar spacing, minimum mold height, maximum mold height, stroke, and daylight.
- Injection Unit Specifications: Just as important as clamp specs, aim for 20 to 80 percent shot capacity for general-purpose resins and 30 to 50 percent for engineered resins. Hence, the advice is to adjust calculations for the right output factor of the material and arrange specifications accordingly for the calculated shot size.
Basically, by taking these factors into account, you can ensure that you select an injection molding machine that not only fits your budget but also meets the specific requirements of your application, ensuring efficient and reliable production
To read more Plastic Injection Molding Machine Global Market Opportunities And Strategies To 2033
View Comments
Please correct your article on IMMs that mentions Milacron. I cannot directly message the writer for some reason. I commented on the post several hours ago. I am the global Communications Lead for Milacron. And, although we appreciate the coverage, the press tonnage listed is very inaccurate. Our presses range up as large as 8,000 ton (not 1,500, as noted in the article). Please correct this information. And please know I am always available to discuss all details for Milacron, but you can also reference the IMM section of our website at https://www.milacron.com/product-types/injection-machines/
Dear Melanie, Hello! This is Juliana Montoya, the content director. I saw your comment, and I appreciate it. I have corrected the numbers. Thank you very much for your feedback and reading us!
Dear Melany
I´m the author of the article. I apologize for the earlier confusion. My response focused on the clamping force ranges for Milacron’s Q and M Series, which cover low and mid-range needs. However, Milacron also offers machines with clamping forces up to 7,650 tons in their full product lineup. Thank you for pointing that out, and I’m sorry for any inconvenience caused.
I am Surprised some companies did not make the list like. JSW, Toyo and Toshiba